M.C.CHAGLA, Y.V.DIXIT
Bapurao Dhondiba Jagtap – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
1. The petitioner has been charge-sheeted in the Court of the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate for having contravened an order passed by the Commissioner of Police under Section 37(3), Bombay Police Act, on 12-11-1955, and he has come before us under Article 228 of the Constitution contending that the case before the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate involves a substantial question as to the interpretation of the Constitution and therefore it should be transferred to this Court and this Court should decide that substantial question of law.
2. Section 37(3), Police Act, empowers the Commissioner of Police by an order in writing to prohibit any assembly or procession whenever and for so long as he considers such prohibition to Be necessary for the preservation of public order. There is a proviso to this sub-section to this effect:
"Provided that no such prohibition shall remain in force for more than fifteen days without the sanction of the State Government".
Acting under this sub-section the Commissioner of Police issued an order on 28-9-1955 and by that order he prohibited for a period of fifteen days any procession of five or more persons in Greater Bombay. He exempte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.