SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Bom) 75

J.C.SHAH, J.M.SHELAT
Juwansinhji Balvirisinhji – Appellant
Versus
Members of the Tribunal – Respondent


Judgment -

1. The petitioner and his four brothers had as Cadets of the former Lakhtar State received as Giras from that State four villages viz. Moti Kishol, Mul Kishol, Rupavati and Karangadh and other lands situate in the village of Talavani, and had obtained the Hak Patrak dated 15th October 1928 duly registered before the Political Agent of the old Eastern Kathiawar Agency.

2. Of these villages only Karangadh and the lands situated in Talavani are situate within the territory of the then State of Saurashtra and therefore, the Saurashtra Land Reforms Act XXV of 1951 as stated in Section 2 thereof would only be applicable to those lands situate in the villages of Karangadh and Talvani. The case of the petitioner is that being divided and separate in food, worship and estate he and his brothers are holding the Giras as tenants-in-common as the lands are not yet divided by motes and bounds. They therefore say that they are Girasdars within the meaning of Section 2 (15) of the said Act.

3. The applicant on behalf of himself and his four brothers made an application before the Mamlatdar of Lakhtar as provided for by Clause 1 of Section 16 of the Act for allotment of the lands describ


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top