SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Bom) 73

M.C.CHAGLA, S.R.TANDOLKAR
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay South, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
D. V. Ghurye – Respondent


Judgment -Chagla, C.J.

1. A very short question in regard to the construction of Section 34, Sub-section (1) and the proviso to Section 34, Sub-section (3) arises on this reference. The assesses made his return of his income for the assessment year 1943-44 and the assessment was completed on the 17th of July 1944. It was then discovered that the assessee had not shown a certain income. Under the circumstances the Income-tax Officer issued a notice on the 20th of March 1952 and this notice was served on the 16th of April 1952. This assessment was completed on the 28th of March 1953. The assessment was challenged on the ground that the notice pursuant to which this assessment was made was not valid, and the Tribunal held that the challenge was Justified and held that the assessment could not be sustained.

2. Now Section 34 (1) deals with the notice and It provides that in cases falling under Clause (a), with which we are concerned in this case, he may serve a notice within eight years of the end of that year, which in this case would be the 31st of March 1944. The notice, as I have already pointed, out, was actually served on the 16th of April 1952, and, therefore, if we were not to lo


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top