SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Bom) 76

S.P.KOTVAL
Sadasheo Jagannath Barapatre – Appellant
Versus
Hemaji Hiraman Bakde – Respondent


ORDER

1. This is an application for revision under Section 20-A (5) of the Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act and it raises a somewhat interesting and important question as to the construction, and effect of Section 74 (2) of the Representation of the People (Second Amendment) Act (Central Act 27 of 1956).

2. The question arises in the following circumstances. The applicant Sadasheo Jagannath Barapatre had at one time stood for election to the former Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly and had been disqualified under the then existing provisions of Section 143 read with Section 7, Clause (c), of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (Act 43 of 1951). The notification (No. 69-4-53), dated 1-9-1953 issued in this behalf by the Election Commission of India was published in the then Madhya Pradesh Gazette of 10-9-1953. The disqualification mentioned in the notification under the said sections read with Rule 114, Sub-rule (5) of the Representation of the People Rules, 1951 was from voting at any election for a period of five years horn the date by which the return was required to he lodged. The date of the filing of the return as stated in the notification, was 24-3-1952,

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top