SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Bom) 117

D.V.VYAS, Y.V.DIXIT
Rajaram Raghu Patil – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

1. Three accused persons including the present appellant, who was accused No. 1 in the Court below, were tried before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for an offence of murder of one Bapu Tukaram Patil, the charge against the three accused persons being that on or about 18-9-1955, in Shaha-pur village they and one Shankar Nalavade, since absconding, in furtherance of a common intention of all intentionally caused the death of Bapu Tukaram Patil of Kodoli and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code. At the trial, the learned Judge acquitted Nos. 2 and 3, hut convicted accused No. 1 under section 326 read with section 34 and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Accused No. 1 now appeals from his conviction and the sentence imposed upon him.

2. The order of conviction runs as follows:

"In the result, I acquit accused No. 1 of the charge under Section 302 but convict him under Section 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 are acquitted of the charge and they are set at liberty".

Now,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top