SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Bom) 209

M.C.CHAGLA, S.R.TANDOLKAR
New India Life Assurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Excess Profiles Tax, Bombay City – Respondent


Judgment

1. The assesses is an insurance company and carries on business in life insurance and other insurance business, it has its head office in Bombay and its branches in other parts of India including Indian States. During the two years under reference, the assessee company earned profits of Rs. 65,203/- and Rs. 1,27,836/- in respect of the non-life assurance business carried on in the Indian States and the Question that had to be considered was whether these two sums were liable to tax both under the Income-tax Act and the E. P. T. Act. The Income-tax Officer came to the conclusion that the profits in respect of Indian States insurance policies arose in British India and hence the immunity from tax in respect of these profits claimed or sought by the company could not be granted. The asses-see appealed to the A. A. O. and the A. A. C, held that the income in respect of this insurance had accrued in the Indian States and therefore he came to the conclusion that these amounts were not liable to tax. Prom this decision the Commissioner appealed to the Tribunal. It is important to note that the only ground of appeal taken by the Commissioner was that the learned A. A. C. erred in h


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top