Y.V.DIXIT, G.B.BADKAS
Keshav Gaman – Appellant
Versus
Bai Rukhaiyabibi and Anr – Respondent
1. This is a tenants petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and it arises under the following circumstances.
2. Opponent No. 1 to this petition is the owner of four pieces of land bearing survey Nos. 133, 134, 140 and 141 situate at Palod in the Mangrol taluka, of which the present petitioner is the tenant. On 10-3-1952 the first opponent as the land-lady issued a notice to the applicant-tenant terminating his tenancy with effect from 31-3-1953 on the ground of bona fide personal cultivation under Section 34 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. As the notice was not complied with, the first opponent filed against the applicant an application for possession of the suit lands on 4-4-1953. This application was rejected by the Mamlatdar on 10-11-1953, holding that the name of the land-lady i.e., the first opponent was net entered in the record of rights on 1-1-1952. From this order an appeal was preferred before the Prant Officer, who confirmed the order of the Mamlatdar, holding that the land-ladys name did not stand in the record of rights as an occupant on 1-1-1952. The ease was then taken in revision before the Bombay Revenue Tribunal.
3. N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.