SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Bom) 128

K.G.DATAR, V.M.TARKUNDE
Deoman Shamji Patil – Appellant
Versus
The State Opponent – Respondent


JUDGMENT - TARKUNDE, J. :

Two interesting questions of law arise in the case. One is whether police officers are empowered by law in the case of a person suspected or accused of an offence under the Bombay Prohibition Act, to take that person, against his will, to a doctor for medical examination. The second question arises if the first is answered in the negative, and that question is whether such a person can lawfully exercise the right of private defence against the force sought to be used in taking him to a doctor.

(2) This being a criminal revision application the facts are no longer in dispute. The petitioner, who will be referred to hereafter as the accused, is a resident of Satana in the Nasik District. On the date of the offence, information was received at the police station at Satana that the accused was behaving in a disorderly manner in a public street under the influence of drink. Thereupon some police constables went to the spot and brought the accused to the police station. They tried to make a panchnama about the physical condition of the accused, but could not get any panchas. Then head constable Wagh, who appears to have been in charge of the police station, asked






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top