J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Ramkrishna Shankarrao – Appellant
Versus
Rangoo-bai and another – Respondent
(2) It is common ground that the applicant ploughed 7 acres and 28 gunthas of land belonging to the non-applicant No. 1 with his tractor. According to the applicant, the non-applicant No. 1 and other cultivators of mauza Belora, tahsil Morshi, applied to the Development Officer. Armaoti, for getting their fields ploughed by a tractor and agreed to defray the costs of the work done. Further according to him, he commenced the work of ploughing in the presence of the non-applicant No. 1 and that the latter acknowledged that he had done the work satisfactorily. He claims his charges at the rate of Rs. 22/- per acre. According to the non-applicant No. 1, her agreement was with the officers of the Development Department and not with the applicant and that though the applicant had ploughed 5 acres of her land she was not liable to pay anything to him. She also pleaded that the Development Officer had agreed to give a taccavi loan for the pu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.