SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Bom) 177

J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Ramkrishna Shankarrao – Appellant
Versus
Rangoo-bai and another – Respondent


ORDER : This is an application for revision under S. 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act of the judgment of the Civil Judge, Amraoti, empowered under S. 18 of the, C. P. Courts Act. dismissing the applicants suit for the recovery of Rs. 167-8-0.

(2) It is common ground that the applicant ploughed 7 acres and 28 gunthas of land belonging to the non-applicant No. 1 with his tractor. According to the applicant, the non-applicant No. 1 and other cultivators of mauza Belora, tahsil Morshi, applied to the Development Officer. Armaoti, for getting their fields ploughed by a tractor and agreed to defray the costs of the work done. Further according to him, he commenced the work of ploughing in the presence of the non-applicant No. 1 and that the latter acknowledged that he had done the work satisfactorily. He claims his charges at the rate of Rs. 22/- per acre. According to the non-applicant No. 1, her agreement was with the officers of the Development Department and not with the applicant and that though the applicant had ploughed 5 acres of her land she was not liable to pay anything to him. She also pleaded that the Development Officer had agreed to give a taccavi loan for the pu

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top