SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Bom) 31

J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Dinanath Shaligram Marvadi – Appellant
Versus
Maroti Totaram Shimpi and others – Respondent


(a) Provincial Insolvency Act (1920), S. 4 - Jurisdiction of Insolvency Court if exclusive - Separate suit if barred ___ (Civil P. C. (1908), S. 9).

What S. 4 purports to do is to confer power or. the Insolvency Court to decide certain questions, and where a question is decided by it then under sub-s. (2) of S. 4 its decision shall be final and binding and can no longer be challenged in any other proceeding. It does not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Court to deal with such questions. Hence a suit by the creditors for a declaration that the property purchased by them in execution of a decree against the insolvent is not liable to attachment and sale in insolvecy proceedings pending against him will not be barred if the question raised in the suit has not been decided by the insolvency Court. (Para 6)

Anno: AIR Man. Provincial Insolvency Act, S. 4 N. 3; AIR Com., C. P. C, S. 9 N. 50.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top