SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Bom) 23

K.G.DATAR, N.M.MIABHOY
Pandurang Laxman Parab, Accused – Appellant
Versus
State of Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DATAR, J. :

This is an appeal filed by the accused who has been convicted for an offence under S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code read with S. 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.

(2) The case of the prosecution was that the accused was at the material time a watchman or a mukaddam in the employ of the Bombay Port Trust. The complainant, one Gulabrao Jagdale, is a driver of a bullock cart which belongs to his master, one Govind Mali. He used to stay in the Lokhandi Jatha, an area which belongs to the Bombay Port Trust. It appears that he has his family which consists of three members at Satara. The complainant used to drive the bullock cart on hire and every day he used to give an account of the earnings which he made by driving the bullock cart. The accused told the complainant not to keep the bullock cart in the Lokhandi Jatha. He told that if the complainant did not give an amount of Rs. 10 per month as bribe, he would make a report to his superior officers and see that he was prevented from keeping his bullock cart in that area. The complainant agreed to pay an amount of Rs. 10 per month and it is stated for the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top