K.G.DATAR, V.M.TARKUNDE
Balaram Abaji Patil and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
M. C. Ragojiwalla and Anr – Respondent
2. The facts on which these questions arise are these: -- The petitioners were employed by respondent No. 2 for the work of preparing salt in certain salt pans. The concern of respondent No. 2 was a factory under the Indian Factories Act, and the petitioners are accordingly covered by the Payment of Wages Act. By a notification issued on 16th June 1953 under Section 27 of the Minimum Wages Act, the category of employment to which the petitioners belonged was brought within the purview of that Act, and by the same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.