V.M.TARKUNDE, Y.S.TAMBE
The State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
The Nagpur Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd. and Anr. – Respondent
2. On 18-12-1959 the Municipal Corporation filed a list of witnesses to whom summonses were to be issued and the list included the store keeper or the Wardha branch of the Company and the Assistant Accountant of the Company at Nagpur, both of whom were cited only for the production of certain documents and records belonging to the Company. Summonses were accordingly ordered to fee issued by the learned trial Magistrate. The Company then applied to the learned Magistrate for the withdrawal of the summonses or the ground that they violated the protection against self-incrimination guaranteed by Article 20(3) of the Constitution. The objection having been overruled by the learned trial Magistrate, the Company went in revision to the Sessions Court, Nagpur, and the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.