SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Bom) 3

J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Gendalal Cotton Mills Ltd. and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Basant Kumaribai – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. This is an application for revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the order of the Court below holding that the Official Liquidators of a limited liability company have no right to institute a suit in forma pauperis for obtaining possession of the property belonging to the Company.

2. As has been pointed out by the Court below there is a conflict of Judicial opinion on this question. There is a group of cases in which it has been held that a Corporation cannot be allowed to sue in forma pauperis, while there is another group of cases in which it is said that it can be so allowed. The learned Judge of the Court below accepted the view of the High Courts of Calcutta, Rangoon and Punjab which is to the effect that a Corporation cannot be allowed to institute a suit as a pauper and dismissed the application made before it by Official Liquidators for being permitted to institute a suit on behalf of the petitioners, The Gendalal Cotton Mills Ltd.

3. Mr. H. R. Gokhale, who appears for the petitioners, relies strongly upon the view taken by the High Court of Madras in ILR (1937) Mad 784, Swaminathan v. Official Receiver of Ramnad and ILR 41 Mad 624, Peru


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top