SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Bom) 16

Y.S.TAMBE, PATWARDHAN, H.K.CHAINANI
Chandbeg Muradbeg and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Raje Madhaorao Devidasrao Jahagirdar – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. The questions referred to the Full Bench are:

(1) Whether having regard to the facts in these appeals the provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958, (Bombay Act No. XCIX of 1958), apply? and

(2) Whether this Court has jurisdiction to hear the appeals in view of the questions raised under the Act or they lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Revenue Authorities ?

2. These questions have been formulated in very wide terms. Clause (b) of Sub-section (3) of section 132 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958, (Bombay Act No. XCIX of 1958) (hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act) provides that in the case of any proceeding under any of the provisions of the enactments repealed by this Act, pending before a civil Court on the date of the commencement of the Act, the provisions of section 125 of the Act shall apply. Sub-section (1) of section 125 requires a civil Court to stay the proceedings and refer such issues as under the Act are required to be decided by an authority specified in the Act, to such authority for determination. Sub-section (2) provides that




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top