J.R.MUDHOLKAR, S.M.SHAH
Mahomed Ebrahim Mahomedi – Appellant
Versus
Essak Haji Alimahomed Haji Sumar. – Respondent
(2) The relevant facts are as follows: The defendants Nos. 1 to 4 had agreed under a deed dated 21st February 1949 to sell to the plaintiff, who is the appellant before us, certain property situate in the city of Bombay for a sum of Rs. 2,80,000/-. Under the agreement the plaintiff paid to the defendants Nos. 1 to 4 a sum or Rs. 15,000/- as earnest money. The defendants had agreed to make out a marketable title free from all claims and demands. The plaintiff thereafter through his attorneys repeatedly called upon the defendants Nos 1 to 4 to make out a marketable title to the property but the defendants failed to make out such a title. Ultimately, the plaintiff by his attorneys letter dated 21st August 1951 put an end to the agreement for sale and called upon the defendants Nos 1 to 4 to return the earnest money of Rs. 15,000/- with interest thereon at 9 per cent per annum from 21st February 1949 and a further sum of Rs. 3,500/- being the estimated cost and the expenses incurred by him in the meanwhile. Eventually the plaintiff instituted the suit of which his appeal arises.
(3) In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.