SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Bom) 41

N.L.ABHYANKAR, D.G.PALEKAR
Vasant Raghunath Gokhale – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. – Respondent


JudgmentAbhyankar, J.

1. This is a petition under Art, 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner was appointed as Revenue Inspector on 7-12-1946 in the then State of Madhya Pradesh. He was confirmed in that capacity on 7-12-1948. Later, he was promoted as Assistant Superintendent of Land Records. He was confirmed as Assistant Superintendent of Land Records by the orders of the Government of Madhya Pradesh on 31-10-1956. The petitioners services were allocated to the new reorganised Stale of Bombay. The petitioner was at Nagpur when he received an order dated 3-9-1957 from the Settlement Commissioner and Director of Land Records. By that order the petitioner was suspended from service from the date of receipt of the order. The order gave certain other directions as follows:

(1) That during the period of suspension he should be paid only the subsistence and other allowances admissible under the B. C. S. Rules, i.e. Bombay Civil Services Rules.

(2) That the petitioner should not leave his Headquarters without the previous permission in writing of the Deputy Commissioner, Bhandara.

(3) That the petitioner is not allowed to accept any private employment or to do any business while under susp





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top