SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Bom) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Chainani, C.J., K.K. Desai and Chandrachud Y.V. , JJ.
Appellants: Anna Balgonda Patil and Ors.
Vs.
Respondent: Vasant Raghunath Kulkarni and Ors.
Special Civil Appln. No. 948 of 1961
Decided On: 09.08.1962
Counsels:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S.C. Pratap, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: S.N. Srikhande, Adv. and Govt. Pleader

Headnote:

section 88C - Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - 14, 31, 32, 33-A, 33-B, 33-C - The judgment discusses the relevant provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, including the conditions for termination of tenancy, right of purchase for tenants, and the exemption for small landlords under section 88C. The court interprets the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C and concludes that the material date varies based on when the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land or when the landlord makes the application under section 88C.

Fact of the Case:

The court considered the question of the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. The dispute arose from differing interpretations of the material date by the landlord, tenant, and the government pleader.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C varies based on when the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land or when the landlord makes the application under section 88C. The court rejected the argument that the material date should be the same in all cases and provided a nuanced interpretation based on the specific circumstances.

Issues: The main issue was the determination of the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C varies based on when the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land or when the landlord makes the application under section 88C. The court provided a detailed analysis of the reasons for this interpretation, considering the specific circumstances and practical implications.

Final Decision: The court concluded that the material date for ascertaining the landlord's eligibility for exemption under section 88C is not the same in all cases and varies based on specific circumstances, including when the tenant is deemed to have purchased the land or when the landlord makes the application under section 88C.

JUDGMENT - Chainani, C.J.

1. The question, which has been referred to the Full Bench, is as follows:

"Whether, for the purpose of section 88C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, the material date lor ascertaining who is the landlord entitled to apply, whether the lands leased by him do not exceed an economic holding, and whether his total annual income does not exceed Rs. 1500/-, is the 1st of April 1957 or the postponed date specified in the first proviso to Sub-section (1) of section 32?"

2. In order to answer this question, it is necessary to consider the relevant provisions of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. Sub-sec, (1) of Section 14 states that notwithstanding any law, agreement or usage, or the decree or order o£ a Court, the tenancy of any land shall not be terminated except on the grounds mentioned in Sub-clauses (i) to (v) of clause (a) of this Sub-section. This Sub-section, therefore, curtails the ordinary right of the landlord to terminate the tenancy of his tenant. He can do so only on one of the grounds mentioned in this Sub-section. Section 31 enables the landlord to terminate the tenancy of his tenant on two other grounds and these are that he requires the land for cultivating it personally or for using it for a non-agricultural purpose. Sub-section (1) of this section provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 14 a landlord may, after giving notice and making an application for possession as provided in Sub-section (2), terminate the tenancy of any land, if the landlord bona fide requires the land for cultivating it personally, or for any . non-agricultural purpose. Sub-section (2) of section 31 states that the notice required .to be given under Sub-section (1) shall be served on the tenant on or before the 3ist December 1956 and that an ap-plication for possession under section 29 shall be made to the Mamlatdar on or before the 31st day of March, 1957. Sub-section (3) enlarges the period for giving a notice under Sub-section (1) and for making an application to the Mamlatdar where the landlord is a minor or a widow or a person subject to mental or physical disability or a serving member of the armed forces. The proviso to this Sub-section is as follows :

"Provided that where a person of such category is a member of a joint family, the provisions of this Sub-section shall not apply if at least one member of the joint family is outside the categories mentioned in this Sub-section unless before the 31st day of March 1958 the share of such person in the joint family has been separated by metes and bounds and the Mamlatdar, on inquiry, is satisfied that the share of such person in the land is separated having regard to the area, assessment, classification and value of the land, in the same proportion as the shar.e of that person in the entire joint family property, and not in a large proportion."

This section therefore lays down 31st March, 1057, as the dote on or before which an application for possession on the grounds mentioned in Sub-section (1) could be made by a landlord, unless he belonged to one of the categories referred to in Sub-section (3). Section 32 makes the tenants the owners of the lands in their possession, with effect from ist April, 1957. except in certain cases. Subsection (1) of this section is in the following terms :

"On the first day of April 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the tillers day) every tenant shall, subject to the other provisions of this section and the provisions of the next succeeding sections, be deemed to have purchased from his landlord, free of all encumbrances subsisting thereon on the said day, the land held by him as tenant, if --

(a) such tenant is permanent tenant thereof and cultivates land personally;

(b) such tenant is not a permanent tenant but cultivates the land leased personally; and

(i) the landlord has not given notice of termination of his tenancy under section 31; or

(ii) notice has been given under section 31, but the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top