SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Bom) 64

VASANTI A.NAIK
Abdulla Alimohamed and Anr – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through the Secretary Ministry of Rehabilitation – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. The suit giving rise to this appeal was filed by the appellants (who will hereafter be called the plaintiffs) against the Union of India, the Custodian of Evacuee Property and the Regional Settlement Commissioner (who will hereafter be called the defendants) for a declaration that the plaintiffs continued to be the tenants of two shop premises and for possession of the said shop premises, The facts underlying this litigation may be briefly stated as follows: The plaintiffs were carrying on business as partners in two shops; (1) M/s, M. Gani and Co., Mahomedali Road, Bombay, and (2) M/s. London Stores, Bori Bunder, Bombay. They were occupying the premises as tenants. On 15-6-1950 the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Property issued a show cause notice in the joint names of the plaintiffs calling upon them to show cause as to why they should not be declared as evacuees and their property as evacuee property under Section 2 (d) (i) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The notice inter alia stated that they had left for Pakistan on account of the selling up of the dominions of India and Pakistan and that all their property w





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top