SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Bom) 3

Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Bank Silver Company – Appellant
Versus
The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT - (1) This is an appeal under S. 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, (Act No. 34 of 1948), from an order passed by the Employees Insurance Court, Bombay. The question which arises in the appeal is whether the appellants Messrs. Bank Silver Company, are a "factory" within the meaning of Section 2 clause (12) of the Act. The appellants filed an application in the Employees Insurance Court for a declaration that they were not covered by the Employees State Insurance Act and that the partners of the appellant firm were not "employees" within the meaning of Section 2 clause (9) of the Act. The application has been dismissed and this appeal is directed against that order.

(2) The facts which are necessary for the decision of the question raised on this appeal are admitted. The appellants are a partnership firm owing an establishment in which articles of silver are manufactured. The firm employs 18 workers in its establishment and, in addition, four of the six partners of the firm also work in the establishment. The respondents, the Employees State Insurance Corporation, contended that the workers working in the establishment of the appellants were covered by the Employees St













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top