JUDGMENT - Patel, J.

XX XX XX

(1) The question is whether the revision of the tariff for the supply of the engorge of the different principle is ultra vires of the act and/or the rules under the act. The contention of is to be found in paragraph 11 (a) of the written statement of where these words are used. Mr. Thakar was not able to show how that the revised tariffs were in contravention of the provisions of the act. When pressed to clarify his contention is said the tariff were not fixed in accordance with the regulations which is entirely a different matter the regulations which is entirely a different matter. This clearly cannot mean that the Board acted ultra vires when the maker of the act has no power or jurisdiction to do in the thing. If the maker hangout the jurisdiction of doing the things, but if it is done in contravention of the rules one speaks of the though an allegation was made in para 11 of the written statement in this connection, twas vague was no particular regulation was alleged to have been violated. Mr. Thakar hasnt been able to below show in what manner any provisions of any of there gelatinous has been violated plaintiff board examined an engineer on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document