JUDGMENT - Chainani, C.J.

1. The question which has been referred to us for our consideration, as re -drafted by us in consultation with the learned counsel for the parties, is as under:

Whether S. 91 of the Maharashtra Co - operative Societies act, 1960, operates as a bar to a dispute between a co - operative in regard to a demands or employees in regard to a demand for the a change in the term of employment or for change reinstatement of the employees, whose services had been terminated, being decided under the C.P. and berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 or the Industrial disputes Act 1947?

The facts in special civil Application No. 765, of 1964 which has given rise to this reference briefly are that the petitioners was employed by the respondent No.1 which is a co - operative society ordinarily registered under the Co - operative societies act, 1912. On 14-11-1962 is services were trepanned with effect from 15-12-1962. On 4-6-1963 he made an application of to the Assistant Commissioners of Labor under Sub -S [2] of S. 16 of the C.P and Berar Industrial Disputes settlement act 1947 in which he prayed that an order should be made for his reinstatement and for payment of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document