SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Bom) 105

D.V.PATEL, B.D.BAL
Manibai and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Harpal Deo and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Patel, J.

(1) The appellants are the widow and sons of one Lallu Rathod, who died in a motot accident. The accident occurred on 25th May 1957 at about 1-25 P. M. at the junction of the Queenss Road and the Princess Street, by car bearing No. BMZ 6532. The car belonged to respondent No. 1 and was being driven either by respondent No. 2 or respondent No. 3. As the plaintiffs had not enough funds to pay court fees, they filed an application to sue in forma pauperis in the City Civil Court about the early part of 1958. They claimed Rs. 15,000/- as damages on all grounds, for the death of Lally Rathod.

(2) The application was pending before the Registrar for enquiry into their pauperism in November 1960. In October of 1959 by notification dated 28th October 1959 the State Government constituted a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal with effect from 1st December 1959 under section 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939. It appears that in view of section 110-F of the Said Act the Registrar of the City Civil Court returned the plaint for presentation to the Tribunal.

(3) The appellants then filed their claim petition before the Motor Accident claims Tribunal on 23rd November 1960. Tis app











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top