VASANTI A.NAIK
Maruti Gurappa and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Bala and Anr. – Respondent
(2) The suit property (i.e survey Nos. 162 and 177) (half share) originally belonged to defendant No. 3 and two others. On 12-4-1949 defendant No. 3 and two others entered into an agreement for selling the said property to the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 1,600/- Part of the sale price i.e. Rs. 585/- was paid on the date of agrteement and the plaintiff was put inpossession of the property. In the month of May, 1949, defendant No. 2 obtained a decree against defendant No. 3 In execution of the said decree, the land in suit was sold inauction and purchased by Deft. No. 1, Deft. No. 1 started proceedings for recovering possession of the property on the basis of the sale certificate. The plaintiff obstructed the delivery of possession. proceedings were started by the auction purchaser for removing the obtruction under Rule 99 of order 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure. After summary enquiry, the Court came to the conclusi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.