SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Bom) 64

M.G.CHITALE, V.M.TARKUNDE
The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Barrel and Drum Manufacturing Co. Private Ltd. and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - (1) This reference has been made under Section 81 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 by the Employees Insurance Court, Bombay, for the decision of two questions of law. The questions submitted by the Employees Insurance Court are:

"(1) Whether rule 17 of the Employees State Insurance Rules is ultra vires the rule making power of the State Government under Section 96 (1) of the Employees State Insurance Act?

(2) The circumstances which have led to these questions are very simple The Employees State Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) filed an application) in the Employees Insurance Court , Bombay, against the Opponents who are a manufacturing company for the recovery of the employees contributions payable under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 for the period from 1st September 1957 to 31st July 1963. The application was filed on 7th October 1963. Rule 17 of the Bombay Employees Insurance Courts Rules, 1959 made by the Government of Bombay in exercise of the powers conferred by section 96 (1) of the said Act purports to prescribe, a period of limitation for every application which may be filed in the Employees Insurance Courts. Rule
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top