SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Bom) 125

M.N.CHANDURKAR
Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath – Appellant
Versus
Janardan Vishwanath Hegde – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the City Civil Court, Bombay dismissing his suit on the preliminary issue that it is barred by res judicata by reason of a previous decision between him and the defendant.

2. The plaintiff used to run a tailoring shop at Tribhuvan Road, Girgaum, Bombay. The shop consisted of two rooms and was run by the plaintiff in the name of Kamath Brothers. The plaintiff was a tenant in respect of the two rooms but by an agreement dated the 1st of November 1965, he gave to the defendant the right to conduct the shop for one year. The defendant obtained possession of one of the two rooms under this agreement and at the end of the year, he exercised the option available to him under the agreement for extension of the period mentioned therein. Under the terms of the agreement, the plaintiff was entitled to recover possession of the shop from the defendant if he failed to pay the monthly royalty for a period of three months. The defendant appears to have fallen in arrears for over three months and thereupon, the plaintiff terminated agreement and filed an application under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top