SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Bom) 96

G.N.VAIDYA
Kacharu Baban Kothawale and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. This is plaintiffs second appeal involving interesting points of law. The properties in dispute are agricultural lands survey Nos. 89 and 90 situated in village Sangavi-Surya in Taluka Parner. Survey No. 89 measures 3 acres 29 gunthas and is assessed at Rs. 5-2-0. It is a Bagayat land called as Malai. Survey No. 90 measures 12 acres 23 gunthas and is assessed at Rs. 3-12-0. It is a Jira-yat land known as Wadi. The plaintiffs are in possession of the suit lands for a number of years. According to them, they and their ancestor have been in possession of the lands for over 60 or 70 years. One Waman Raghunath Kulkarni was shown In the record of rights extracts as the occupant of the said lands. The plaintiffs are shown in the record of rights as tenants of the said lands.

2. The Talathi of the village reported to the Taluka Magistrate of Parner that the occupant Waman Raghunath was not known to be living and the lands were intestate property. The report of the Tala- thi was received by the Taluka Magistrate on July 26, 1960 and the Taluka Magistrate in his turn made a report to the District Judge, Ahmednagar on October 15, 1962 purporting to act under Section 10 of Bombay




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top