SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Bom) 13

M.N.CHANDURKAR, D.B.PADHYE
Mandwale Ramchand Maroti – Appellant
Versus
Malkapur Municipal Council, Malkapur and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Padhye, J.

1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge the demand notice dated 21st January 1967 as being illegal and prays for a writ of prohibition to the respondents from making the recovery of the education tax on the basis of the said demand notice dated 21st January 1967. The petitioner also seeks a direction that the respondent No. 2, the State oi Mahara-shtra, bo ordered to restore and repay the amount of Rs. 775.50 to the petitioner which has been collected by the respondent No. 1 for respondent No. 2 towards the education tax for the period from 1962-63 to 1964-65. The petitioner further wants a prohibition against the respondents prohibiting them from further recovering any amount under the Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act, 1962 and the Rules thereunder. A relief is also claimed for a declaration that the Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act 1962 be declared as ultra vires of the Constitution.

2. The petitioner is a resident of Malkapur, taluq Malkapur, District Buldana and owns several lands and buildings in the town of Malkapur. Most of these buildings are let out to tenants and the petitioner gets rent for


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top