SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Bom) 36

M.N.CHANDURKAR
Kamalesh Dashrath Fokmare and Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Sukudoe Pundlik Mahalle – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. An important question which arises in this case and has been very elaborately argued is whether a Tahsildar in the exercise of the powers under Section 30 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, hereafter referred to as the Tenancy Act, can make an order directing the tenant to pay arrears of rent which had fallen due before the Tenancy Act came into force. The petitioners are the landlords of survey number 37/1, area 7 acres 34 gunthas, situated at Chandur, Taluq and district Akola. This field originally belonged to Bhikaji the grand-father of the petitioners and devolved on them by virtue of a will made by Bhikaji, who died on 21-8-1957. It is not disputed that the petitioners, had a right to recover lease money in respect of the years 1954-55, 1955-56 and 1956-57. They had served a notice on 30-11-1959 purporting to be one under Section 19 of the Tenancy Act terminating the tenancy of the respondent-tenant in case he failed to pay Rs. 480 as lease money. No steps for obtaining possession consequent on this termination were taken, but the petitioners later gave another notice on 6-6-1960 calling upon the respondent to pay an amount



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top