SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Bom) 41

V.S.DESHPANDE
Bindichand Hiralal Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Babu Sadashiv Borhade. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. The petitioner is the original plaintiff. On 1-9-1964 he filed a suit for possession of a shop situate in Ganji Market, Saraf Bazzar, Ward No. 6 of Ahmednagar City, bearing Municipal Committee No. 2801, City Survey No. 3093, against two defendants under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Act;) on the sole ground of defendant No. 1 tenant having failed to pay arrears of rent for more than six months in spite of service of notice under Section 12 (2) of the Rent Act. It was alleged that defendant No. 2 was running the said shop as the servant of the defendant No. 1 Defendant No. 1 did not contest and the proceedings were se ex parte against him. Defendant No. 2 contested the suit, pleading that he was a lawful sub-tenant and had paid rent to defendant No.

1 and cannot be evicted for breach of Section 12 (3) of the Rent Act by defendant No. 1.

2. The trial Court accepted the case of the plaintiff that defendant No. 2 was the servant of defendant No. 1 and passed a decree for eviction against both for non -payment of rent by defendant No. 1 and also a decree for rent against defendant No. 1. On appeal b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top