SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Bom) 64

G.N.VAIDYA
Bhila Keshav Patil and Anr – Appellant
Versus
Ganpati Chunilal Kabre and Anr. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - 1. The only question owhich arises in this sppecial civil lapplication under Article 227 of the Coonstitution of oIndia is whether the petitioners ohad exercised their rights of statutory purchase under section 32-0 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, within onw year from the commencement of the tenancy within the meaning of thata section.

2. The facts are as follows:-

The subject-matter of dispute between the parties i.e. the petitioners-tenants and their landloard-respondent No. 1 is Gat No.102, measuring 14 acres and 13 gunthas assessed at Rs.40 - 12 , situated at Village palsod in Taluka Jalgaon. On October 28, 1967, the petitioners made an application before the Agriicultural Lands Tribunal and Tahsildar Jalgaon, stating that they ohoad cultivated the land in 1966-67 as teanants and ohad given necessary onotice to purchase the suit-land on June 30, 1967 and should be, therefore, declared the purchasers of the land under section 32-0 and the priice should be fixed under section 32-G and 32-H. All the time during the pendency of the said case before the Agricultural Lands Tribunal. the landlord-respondent No. 1 merely took adjoournments 20 times and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top