C.S.DHARMADHIKARI
Darubai – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Narayan Petil – Respondent
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of arrears of maintenance amount and for future maintenance and claimed a decree for Rs. 2700/- as arrears of maintenance ad future maintenance at the rate of Rs 75/- per month. The defendant filed an application dated 10-2-1972 under Section 3 of the Act for stay of the suit on the grounds stated in the application, According to the defendant, the present suit is a suit for money. The defendant earns his livelihood wholly by agriculture carried on within the limits of the State of Bombay and he ordinarily engages personally in agriculture within those limits, and therefore, he is an agriculturist within the meaning of the aforesaid Act. The field property of para, 2 of the said Act are made applicable tot he whole of the Buldana dist
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.