SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Bom) 98

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR
Kasturchand Panachand Doshi & others – Appellant
Versus
Yeshwant Vinayak Sainkar & anothers – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.A. JAHAJIRDAR, J.:---The facts involved in his petition are very few though the scope of the inquiry has been widened by the considerable industry which Shri Ajit P. Shah, appearing for the first petitioner, has brought to bear on this matter. The first petitioner was a tenant of a room measuring 19 x 14 and situated in building No. 427/428-A at Budhwar Peth in Pune City. He came into possession of the suit room, hereinafter referred to as the suit premises, pursuant to a rent note executed on 1st of October, 1957. The said rent note has specifically mentioned that the first petitioner hereinafter referred to for brevitys sake as "the petitioner", was to conduct the business of milk in the suit premises. The second petitioner is the son of the first petitioner while the third petitioner is the firm of the first two petitioners. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are the owners of the building in which the suit premises are situated and, therefore, the landlords of the petitioners.

2. Having noticed that the petitioners were about to use the suit premises for the purpose of workshop by installing heavy machinery in the same, the respondent sent a notice to them on 13th of March,




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top