SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Bom) 244

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR, D.N.MEHTA
Ganpat Raoji Suryavanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

R.A. JAHAGIRDAR, J.:---After the hearing of this appeal was over on 18th of October, 1979 we dictated an order allowing the appeal and acquitting the accused who had been convicted in Sessions Case No. 19 of 1975 of the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Sessions Judge of Satara. We had mentioned that we would given reasons later. Accordingly we are giving the reasons in this judgment.

2. In Sessions Case No. 19 of 1975, tried by the learned Sessions Judge of Satara, the appellant in this appeal, hereinafter referred to as "the accused", was prosecuted for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It was alleged that the accused had committed the murder of one Gangubai, wife of Dagdu Chougule, by inflicting knife injuries on her person on the night of 25th of October, 1974. The learned Sessions Judge convicted the accused of the offence with which he was charged and sentenced him to imprisonment for the life by his judgment and order dated 29th of September, 1975.

3. The prosection case in the Court below as that on 25th of October 1974 which was the Dassera day the murder of Gangubai was committed. Befor


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top