A.A.GINWALA
Laxman Vithal Rewankar – Appellant
Versus
Rajaram Narayan Pohurkar – Respondent
2. The non-applicant owns a room which is the subject matter of this litigation. He had let it out to the applicant at the monthly rental of Rs. 10. In 1970 the non-applicant made an application to the Rent Controller under the provisions of clause 13(3), (i) and(ii) of the Order for permission to serve a notice on the applicant determining his lease on the ground that the applicant was in arrears of rent for an aggregate period of three months and that he was habitually in arrears of rent. It appears in this application non-applicant alleged that the applicant had paid the rent till end of August 1967 and in September 1967 non-applicant took a loan of Rs. 100 from the applicant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.