SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Bom) 21

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Rango Laxman Pingle deceased by his heir Govind Rango – Appellant
Versus
Kumudini Chandrakant Pethkar and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - MANOHAR SUJATA V., J.: - The appellants in the two Letters Patent Appeals are the son and grand-sons of one Laxman Pingle. On or about 2nd March 1922 a Special Civil Suit No. 341 of 1922 was filed by Khanderao Mehendale against the sons of Laxman Pingie for recovery of a sum of about Rs. 18,150 together with interest thereon on the basis of a pro-note. The disputes between the parties were referred to arbitration. Ultimately an award was given in This arbitration pursuant to which a decree in terms of the award was passed on 21-3-1922. Under the terms of the decree, the defendants, that is to say, the sons of Laxman Pingle were ordered to pay a sum of Rs. 20,000 to the plaintiff Mehendale and in satisfaction of the amount, Pingles were directed to deliver possession of an immovable property viz, Survey No. 15 from Donaje village in Haveli Taluka, Poona District to the plaintiff decree-holder. It was further provided that the plaintiff decree-holder would enjoy the property till the end of 1964 as his own property and he would give accounts of the mesne profits to the defendants. If he satisfied them that his dues were not fully recovered and that they still owed some amo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top