D.B.DESHPANDE
Putalabai w /o Lakhu Pawar and others – Appellant
Versus
Shiva Dhondi Pawar and others – Respondent
2. This transaction was validated under section 31AA of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of HoldingS Act, 1947(here-inafter referred to As the “Fragmentation Act”) by paying the prescribed penalty. In fact I shall point out that this validation was Also not at all necessary in this case. After the death of Lakhu all his heirs And legal repre-sentatives who are plaintiffs 1 to 8 in this suit gave a notice dated 8-1968 to the defendants for reconveyance of the land after offering the amount of Rs. 700 to them. Both the defendants declined and hence the plaintiffs filed this suit.
3. The defendants, inter alia, resisted the suit on the ground that it is A fragment under the Fr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.