SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Bom) 96

A.A.GINWALA
Chandrabhan Chunnilal Gour – Appellant
Versus
Shravan Kumar Khunnolal Gour and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - GINWALA A.A., J. : - This Revision Application has been filed against the finding recorded by the trial Court on the issue regarding the validity of the transaction of sale between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2. The facts leading to the present Revision Application shortly stated are as follows.

2. Non-applicant No. 1 has instituted the suit in the Court below against the applicant and non-applicant No. 2 as defendants Nos. 1 and 2 respectively, for a decree for possession of the suit house from defendant No. 1 along with Rs. 210 as damages for use and occupation from 26-9-1972 to 26-6-1973. The suit house originally belonged to defendant No. 2 which is admittedly a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950(hereinafter referred to as the Act). The plaintiff purports to have purchased it from defendant No. 2 under a registered sale-deed on 26-9-1972. Defendant No 1 who is alleged to be in actual possession of the suit house is said to be a near relative of one Chuniyabai who is alleged to have bequeathed it to defendant No. 2. Thus according to the plaintiff, defendant No. 2 became owner of the suit house on the death of Chuniyabai on 29-7-1968.





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top