SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Bom) 25

V.S.KOTWAL, M.N.CHANDURKAR
Mallappa Guruppa Chaugule – Appellant
Versus
Padmanna Omanna Sajane And Others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - CHANDURKAR M.N., J. : - This petition filed by the original owner of survey No. 145 of village Shedshal, Taluka Shired, District Kolhapur, challenges

the action taken by the Settlement Commissioner under section 32(1) of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), whereby the original scheme for consolidation which had become final is now sought to be modified by the Settlement Commissioner.

2. In a scheme of consolidation in respect of the village of Mahuli, the petitioner was allotted land bearing revision survey No. 146/l-A and revision survey No. 146/1-B admeasuring 1 hectare 58 ares which constituted Gat No. 622. These fields were originally owned by respondent No. 1 before consolidation. Respondent No. 1 was allotted 1 hectare 56 ares out of revision survey No. 145 which was given Gat No. 23. According to the petitioner, this scheme of consolidation was arrived at on the basis of an agreement between the two parties and this arrangement was, therefore, included in the scheme. The petitioner alleged that a joint statement was made by the parties on 22nd November 1973. The petitioner also claimed











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top