SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Bom) 93

R.A.JAHAGIRDAR
Nandlal Goverdhandas & Co. & others – Appellant
Versus
Samratbai Lilachand Shah (Smt. ) – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.A. JAHAGIRDAR, J.:---A question of law which has become interesting on the peculiar facts of this case has been raised in this position. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arising out of proceedings initiated by the respondent in this petition under the provisions of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as "the Bombay Rent Act."). The respondent is the landlady of a building bearing House No. 850 and situated at Budhwar Peth at Pune. The petitioners are the tenants of two rooms bearing block Nos. 2 and 3 which were subsequently amalgamated. Block No. 2 was taken on lease in the year 1933 and Block No. 3 was taken on lease in the year 1943. The first petitioner is a partnership firm of which the other petitioners are the partners.

2. The building was originally owned by the husband of the respondent who during his lifetime on 31st of January, 1944 executed a Will bequeathing the house in which the premises tenanted by the petitioners. (hereinafter referred to as "the suit premises") are situated in favour of the respondent. This was one only of the other proportions which were bequeath



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top