D.P.MADAN, P.S.SHAH
D. R. Kohli, Collector of Central Excise, Bombay & others – Appellant
Versus
Associated Films Industries Pvt. Ltd. , Tardeo – Respondent
2. The facts which are not in dispute are these :
The respondent No. 2, is the Director and a Shareholder of the respondent No. 1 Company, which owns and runs a Division knowns as Film Centre and inter alia carries on the business of printing and processing cinematograph films. The Company has been paying excise duty on such cinematograph films under item No. 37 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. Prior to April 1, 1969, item No. 37 in the First Schedule to the said Act read as under.
CINEMATOGRAPH FILMS EXPOSED
Tariff Item Description of Goods Rate of Duty
No. Basic Special Excise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
37 Cinematograph Films Exposed of a width below 30 mm.
of 30 mm. in width
or higher.
-------------------------------------------------------
(1) Newsreels and shorts not 15 paise 10 paise 20 of the basic
exceeding 500
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.