S.C.PRATAP
Air India Cabin Crew Association & others – Appellant
Versus
Air India – Respondent
2. Hearing in extenso the rival submissions of the respective Counsel and going through the petition reply and rejoinders as also the reported and unreported judgments cited before me, I am of the view that this is not a case warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. Indeed, grant of any relief therein is be set with many difficulties.
3. At the outset and as rightly urged on behalf of the respondent Air India the question of deployment and or reduction of cabin crew complement as also the matter of standard force and or pattern of crew scheduling are matters essentially and basically partaking the character of management functions. It is not a matter of industrial adjudication. Though effort was made to challenge this position, the same by now stands beyond the pale of controversy not only by virt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.