SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Bom) 82

B.J.RELE
Jethmal Himmatmal Jain and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Rele B.J., J. :- The petitioner No. 1, who is the employer, and peti­tioners Nos. 2 to 5, who are the employees in the first petitioner's chemist shop known as “Maharashtra Medical Stores” at Kalachowki, Bombay, have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash proceedings in Case No. 166/S of 1977 pending in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 28th Court, Esplanade, Bombay.

2. This application raises an important question in regard to thejurisdiction of the Court to take cognizance of an offence without first con­doning the delay. Petitioner No. 1 is the proprietor of Maharashtra Medical Stores. Petitioner No. 2 is the Manager of the said proprietary concern. Petitioner No. 3 is a qualified person employed in the said concern and petitioners Nos. 4 and 5 are the employees.

3. In the course of investigation in C. R. No. 64/74 of Criminal

Branch Control (Drugs), C. I. D., Bombay, the police arrested one Rajani-

kant Laxraichand Mehta on 23rd July 1974 and seized from his residence at Sonawalla Building, C. P. Tank, Bombay, huge stock of drugs stocked for sale without licence. Some of the drugs were mis-branded drugs bearin
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top