B.C.GADGIL, M.N.CHANDURKAR, V.S.DESHPANDE
Sheela Schidananda Damle – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati and others. – Respondent
“Whether the writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are maintainable at the behest of the teachers for enforcement of their entitlements under or arising out of the Secondary Schools Code?”
2. Shri Madkholkar, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner Watkar, made a statement at the Bar that his case is not covered by the question referred, as he is not claiming any relief under the Secondary Schools Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). His petition seeks to enforce his right arising out of the Government Resolution referred to in his petition. The question raised in Watkar's case can be disposed of separately by the Division Bench itself without regard to the answer to the question referred being in the affirmative or negative. We, therefore, did not think it necessary to hear him and made it clear that the judgment in this case will not cover his petition. It will be placed before
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.