SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Bom) 249

B.C.GADGIL, M.N.CHANDURKAR, V.S.DESHPANDE
Sheela Schidananda Damle – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati and others. – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Deshpande V.S., C.J.-The two writ petitions of (1) Watkar and (2) Smt. Damle are referred to the Full Bench by an order dated 7-8-I98I by a Division Bench (Masodkar and Jamdar JJ). The question referred by the Division Bench, reads as follows :

“Whether the writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con­stitution of India are maintainable at the behest of the teachers for en­forcement of their entitlements under or arising out of the Secondary Schools Code?”

2. Shri Madkholkar, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner Watkar, made a statement at the Bar that his case is not covered by the question referred, as he is not claiming any relief under the Secondary Schools Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). His petition seeks to enforce his right arising out of the Government Resolution referred to in his petition. The question raised in Watkar's case can be disposed of separately by the Division Bench itself without regard to the answer to the question referred being in the affirmative or negative. We, therefore, did not think it necessary to hear him and made it clear that the judgment in this case will not cover his petition. It will be placed before


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top