SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Bom) 249

D.M.REGE
Jogindersingh Ravail Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sitavanti Avtarsingh Bhasin – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Rege D.M. J.:-This Writ Petition challenges the order of the Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes, Bombay, dated 1–2-1982 who dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the order of the single Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Bombay, dated 19–10–1981 ordering the execution of the decree for eviction to proceed on the respondent's application.

2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Court had passed the said order without giving him any notice of the same and without complying with the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure for execution of the decree.

3. Respondent and his Advocate have remained absent. However, this order is being passed after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner on merit and after considering the material on record.

4. For appreciating the said contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, certain undisputed facts may be stated at the outset. The litigation relates to a room No. 1 in building No. 736 T. P. S. Plot No.111, Bandra, Bombay. Some time in 1967 respondent who is the owner of the said premises filed a suit in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay, being suit No. 3114 of 196
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top