SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 130

S.W.PURANIK, M.R.WAIKAR
Prabhakar Atmaram Kale (Defendant) – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Santaji More and another (Plaintiffs) – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Waikar J.-This is a reference made by the District and Sessions Judge, Akola under Order XLVI Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure on an appli-cation made to him by the original defendant in the small causes suit for ejectment which was decreed against him.

2. The dispute was in respect of one room admeasuring 13'x 12', which according to the plaintiffs (who are brothers) was let out to the defendant on a monthly rent of Rs. 3. The plaintiffs obtained necessary permission of the House Rent Controller and by a quit notice dated 21–9-1979 determined the tenancy with effect from 31–10–1979 and filed the suit for ejectment, arrears of rent and damages.

3. It appears that the suit or ejectment was filed even before the appeal filed by the defendant (Tenant) to the Resident Deputy Collector, Akola against the order of the Rent Controller was decided.

4. The contention of the defendant in the Small Cause's Suit was that the permission granted by the House Rent Controller had not become final as the appeal against the same before the Resident Deputy Collector was still pending. He, therefore, prayed for stay of the suit till the decision of that appeal. He further stated that the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top