SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Bom) 287

SHARAD MANOHAR
Nanubhai M. Patel – Appellant
Versus
Jagmohanlal Bilasari Rungta – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SHARAD MANOHAR, J.:---Both the appeals arise out of the same suit. A.O. No. 416/1982, however, arises out of the order passed by the trial Court refusing to set aside the ex parte decree passed against the present appellant, who was the defendant in the suit, while First Appeal No. 710/1982 is filed by him, by way of abundant caution, against the ex parte decree itself challenging the same on merits.

As will be presently pointed out, the appeal from order has got to be allowed because the learned Judge has dismissed the defendant's notice of motion for setting aside the ex parte decree without really applying his mind to the facts and equities of the case. Moreover, he has confused and jumbled between the application for setting aside the ex parte decree and the merits of the defence. I am stating here that since I am allowing the appeal from order and setting aside the ex parte decree passed against the defendant, it is unnecessary for me to admit First Appeal No. 710/82 and to appreciate the reasoning of the learned Judge while passing the ex parte decree. But I make it clear that if it was necessary, I would have not hesitated to admit First Appeal No. 710/1982 becaus



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top