P.S.SHAH, S.N.KHATRI
Sanmukh D. Makhija & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent
2. The facts which are relevant for our purpose in all these petitions are more or less similar. Writ Petition No. 214 of 1982 was argued as a representative petition.
3. In Writ Petition No. 214 of 1982 the petitioner is a holder of C.L. III Licence which has been issued to him under the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with Rule (1) of the Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973. Licence has been issued in his favour for retail sale of country liquor on the terms and conditions mentioned in the licence. This licence has been held by the petitioner for the last several years and is renewed from time to time and has thus been valid and subsisting upto March 31, 1982. At the commencement of the financial year 1981-82 the petitioner's licence was renewed for a period of 3 months upto June 30
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.