SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 69

P.S.SHAH, S.N.KHATRI
Sanmukh D. Makhija & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - P.S. SHAH, J.:---This is a group of 11 petitions filed by the liquor vendors under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the increase in the licence fees by the Government with effect from July 1, 1981. The petitioners have been granted these licences under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 read with the relevant Rules.

2. The facts which are relevant for our purpose in all these petitions are more or less similar. Writ Petition No. 214 of 1982 was argued as a representative petition.

3. In Writ Petition No. 214 of 1982 the petitioner is a holder of C.L. III Licence which has been issued to him under the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with Rule (1) of the Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973. Licence has been issued in his favour for retail sale of country liquor on the terms and conditions mentioned in the licence. This licence has been held by the petitioner for the last several years and is renewed from time to time and has thus been valid and subsisting upto March 31, 1982. At the commencement of the financial year 1981-82 the petitioner's licence was renewed for a period of 3 months upto June 30

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top