SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 219

S.P.KURDUKAR, M.L.PENDSE, M.N.CHANDURKAR
Tapti Oil Industries & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


Judgment

M.N. CHANDURKAR, Ag. C.J.:---These two petitions, in each of which petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm and petitioner No. 2 is a partner, raise a question as to whether the petitioners can claim a right to issue of an Eligibility Certificate under a scheme framed by the State Government under which several incentives were promised to small scale, medium and large industries with a view to speed up the pace of industrialisation of the developing industries (sic) in the State. The petition was required to be heard by the Full Bench because on the construction of the said scheme a Division Bench of this Court at Aurangabad held that even though the required steps under the scheme are completed, an industry is not entitled to enforce any right for the issue of an eligibility certificate under the scheme under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. A scheme of incentives comprising mainly incentives in the nature of refund of sales tax, relief in electricity duty, octroi duty, etc., has been in force in Maharashtra since 1964. That scheme was modified and the period of the scheme, as modified from 1st August, 1966, expired on 31st October, 1979. The Government having it































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top