SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Bom) 109

B.C.GADGIL, H.H.KANTHARIA
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
R. J. Mehta & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.C. GADGIL, J.:---This is a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act. The proceeding is initiated against four persons. Respondent No. 1 is a trade union leader or labour leader and in that capacity he is involved in many disputes before the labour courts and Industrial courts. Sometime before 25-11-1983 he released a statement to the press and on its basis the English daily "Time of India" published the news item. That item reads as follows :---

DRAFT ALLEGED AMONG JUDICIAL OFFICERS

By a Staff Reporter

Bombay, November 84 : Allegations of corruption among judicial officials of the Industrial and labour courts were made by the Engineering Mazdoor Sabha to day.

Mr. R.J. Mehta, President of the Sabha demanded on behalf of the free trade union movement, the appointment of a High Court judge to investigate the matter.

In a statement here, he alleged that the Industrial and Labour courts were quoting different 'rates' for issuing injunctions against any party and for its confirmation and vacation.

The Sabha said that depending upon the consideration offered by the employers, the courts issued a decision reinstating a worker, rejected the demand or partially granted the demand.

C






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top